Welcome Guest
 
Join | Login
 
4 shows opening today
3 shows opening next week
12 shows on now
Add a show
 
 
Advertisements
 
rejected.jpg
 
aspiring_art_prize.gif
 
Your ad here
 
 
 
 
 

Down Into The Grid

Forum > Reviews

Fabrication

Noel Ivanoff and monique Jansen
at Vavasour Godkin Gallery
18 Apr 2007 - 15 May 2007

by John Hurrell 19 Apr 2007

*****
1 Vote - 5 Stars


25 Comments

 

Vavasour Godkin is a gallery that tends to specialise in minimalist abstraction and visual restraint. Only occasionally do recognisable images get presented, and that usually if some unusual creative process is involved – such as in for example, the photographs of Lisa Benson. This show, Fabrication, has as its theme the grid format - and the box shapes that function as modules and which can be pulled apart from it. The art practices of Noel Ivanoff and Monique Jansen make an intriguing combination. Jansen exhibits mainly etched works on paper this time but her earlier panelled paintings used to be more colourful. It is the same with Ivanoff, with only orange, white and yellow used apart from natural woodgrain. No blues or greens that he used in the past.

 

Of Jansen's etchings and drawings, the most exciting is a large image of a wire mesh with holes in it. However her most exhilarating contribution to the show in general is an unusual book of graph paper on a Perspex-covered plinth. It has thousands of tiny squares cut out of the centre of slightly larger, graph-paper units to create a delicate trellis effect. It is an extraordinary work, not so much because of Jansen’s obsessive labour but simply because it is mysterious. You can only examine the top two sheets, so to try and visualise what has been removed you need to carefully examine the scribbled handwriting and ruled biro grid-lines on these pages, and speculate from there.

 

The other artist, Noel Ivanoff, has been working with grids for some time now, using them as support structures behind panels. They were viewed through glass fronts overlaid with translucent film, this being imprinted with oil paint textures transferred from a previously painted companion panel. He also has used new wooden pallets on which he had fastened panels of immaculately laid paint. These he exhibited on the floor and the wall.

 

In this current show Ivanoff has a massive, six metre long, cedar stretcher positioned on the main wall. It is a much bigger version of Jansen’s paper trellises, and like his earlier glass/film works has a seemingly Japanese sensibility. 

On the floor he displays a suite of five beautifully made plywood and pine crates that you discover to be bottomless. Most are lined on their inner walls with painted mdf panels.

 

Not only is Ivanoff extending here a metaphor for portability (or nomadic mindset) that he seems to have developed with the pallets, but with these crates he looks at the notion of art enclosure and the hermeticism of the art world itself. These ‘crates’ could be gallery spaces. The orange and yellow, if taken as gallery walls, imply because of their saturation level, a claustrophobia one would need to escape from. They push the boundaries of what a painting might be through their mischievous construction because you can’t stand back to admire the painted planes from a distance, nor can you jump inside them to get a really close look. They are deliciously exasperating.

 

http://www.vavasourgodkin.co.nz/

 

 


 
 
 

Pictures from events associated with this article:

 

RSS: this topic's comments Post to Facebook Printable version

Comments:
 
25 Comments, showing 1 to 20
Page: 1 2   Next >>
Link 
william blake
20 Apr 2007 9:14 am
24 articles & 677 comments since 15 Aug 2006
mmmmmmm...modern art


 
Link 
John Hurrell
20 Apr 2007 9:39 am
122 articles & 1508 comments since 2 Dec 2005
Ya hate it, huh?

It's contemporary too, you know.. or do think you know exactly what contemporary art is right now? And the above is not it?


 
Link 
cadmium hed
20 Apr 2007 9:58 pm
6 articles & 431 comments since 30 Apr 2006
Can't say I hate it...can't say I rate it.
Maybe I lack the correct critique tools
to decipher this...'exasperating' show.
Perhaps a clawhammer would suffice?


 
Link 
John Hurrell
22 Apr 2007 12:55 pm
122 articles & 1508 comments since 2 Dec 2005
'Clawhammer' indicates, cadmium red, that you feel a little more than indifference.
If you hate something, why not say so....?


 
Link 
william blake
22 Apr 2007 6:50 pm
24 articles & 677 comments since 15 Aug 2006
hate is a strong word....the homer simpson reference is more to do with consumption...and con-mod is an easy target for consumer tastes. it is no longer the 'difficult and obtuse idiom' of gordon browns' days.

i love modernism, there are many chapters to the grand narrative.


 
Link 
cadmium hed
22 Apr 2007 8:46 pm
6 articles & 431 comments since 30 Apr 2006
'Clawhammer' indicates, john rurrell, that I feel little more than indifference.-
Do I want attack this show? Not really-i'm just nonplussed (perhaps ignorantly)
at the obviously high level of brainaching artspeakulation brought to bear
on what looks to me to be a lot of boxes (without bottoms!!!) and varying
takes on the good old square, some showing admirable patience to create.
But if you want me to 'hate' this show I can't.
I'm trying, just so you can tell me why I shouldn't, but without actually
seeing it in the flesh,woodgrain,pulp,etc. I have no real seething deconstructive
need to evicserate it in a carpenterish manner, more a desire to rearrange those
bloody straight lines into something a little less GRIDLIKE.
Am I on my own here in thinking that the 'artworld' could get by without an(other)
exhibition of rigid square linear boxlike gridbased soulless(?) constructions in a nice
white straight edged squared lined freshly bleached cooler than thou gallery?
Or am I just a straightline philistine?
By the way I have no idea what contemporary art is. Right now.
I'm such a dated square.



 
Link 
John Hurrell
22 Apr 2007 9:55 pm
122 articles & 1508 comments since 2 Dec 2005

Well c.r. (a messy painter huh?) you might notice that the 'boxes' on the floor are deliberately not gridlike. It is as if the squares have been pulled out from the grid and scattered.

I personally adore grids. In fact I can't get enough. So shut your eyes c.r. and shut down your computer, here are some more for kindred souls like myself. From the late great Donald Judd and Sol LeWitt....

Yum yum, a grid fest!



 
Link 
cadmium hed
22 Apr 2007 10:54 pm
6 articles & 431 comments since 30 Apr 2006
(John, u keep implying i have marxist leanings by substituting r for h
in my online moniker so i'm replying in kind...)

Well J.R. ( a sadist huh?) you almost took me out there with that withering
broadside of grid images. Phew.
But fortunately square dregs don't fit in round holes.
And MY eyes are gloriously, voluptuously CIRCULAR!

'Tis truely true that any artist worth his wine,
'twould be hard pushed to follow a straight line.


 
Link 
John Hurrell
22 Apr 2007 11:42 pm
122 articles & 1508 comments since 2 Dec 2005

Cadmium Hed, thanks for pointing out my mistake. I'm a bit myopic in front of the blinding screen.
You sound like Hundertwasser's ghost to me with your organic line fixation. Or is it Gaudi you dream about?

So you have a yellow and a red nostril? Safer to sniff than eat I imagine.



 
Link 
william blake
23 Apr 2007 4:22 pm
24 articles & 677 comments since 15 Aug 2006
john; the beautiful judd and le witt images force the ivanoff / jansen show into a seeming parody of them. i suppose the devil is in the detail....


 
Link 
John Hurrell
23 Apr 2007 5:39 pm
122 articles & 1508 comments since 2 Dec 2005

Yes but with Ivanoff, the relationship of the planes of painted colour to the four plywood 'box' walls is pretty unusual, if not delightfully perverse. He's messing with the movement of the viewer. Antiphenomenological I guess. I see your point why it might be a satire but I think NI is simply exploring ways of bodily interaction without intending ridicule.


Likewise Jansen's mutilated graphbook, with its histories of previous use, is more than a portable Sol LeWitt. She chose not to use a brand new one.



 
Link 
Spider You
27 Apr 2007 2:02 pm
1 article & 108 comments since 21 Mar 2006
Right now?!


 
Link 
John Hurrell
27 Apr 2007 3:19 pm
122 articles & 1508 comments since 2 Dec 2005
So Portnoy, what are you wearing if you don't like Treasures? You like squishy organic lines, round lines, dotty lines, no lines at all...?
Where's it at for you, Mr. Nonabsorbent Mature Citizen?


 
Link 
william blake
27 Apr 2007 4:00 pm
24 articles & 677 comments since 15 Aug 2006
here is the point for me, if scully had stopped with his grids this wouldnt have been painted.. 'wall of light desert night' 1999.


 
Link 
cadmium hed
28 Apr 2007 9:10 am
6 articles & 431 comments since 30 Apr 2006
You know, i'll wear tartan anyday, everyday, but grids just give me the cubist  shits.


 
Link 
John Hurrell
29 Apr 2007 9:33 am
122 articles & 1508 comments since 2 Dec 2005

WB, I guess I'd not call Scully a grid painter (he is not austere enough) but one preoccupied with pulse and subtle rhythm, and mood. I once saw a great Scully work in Tate Modern. Sombre, sensual, and understated with perfect scale. By the way, Tate archives have an excellent talk he gave, talking about his early life in cockney London.

Actually though, like Gretchen Albrecht, his works are definitely best encountered one at a time. Too many in a  group (ie. more than two in a room) is plain exhausting. Surveys inevitably become disasters because you get drained by visual overload.



 
Link 
paul
29 Apr 2007 8:16 pm
1 article & 142 comments since 11 Aug 2006
workman-like scully, like formula albrecht, when viewed collectively, is great for insomnia.


 
Link 
John Hurrell
29 Apr 2007 10:25 pm
122 articles & 1508 comments since 2 Dec 2005
The modernist routine of variations on a theme is still a valid method of discovery I think. The works of say, Albrecht and /or Scully are so particular to scale that to be suitably attentive you really need to concentrate on one at a time. So it is not about how they were made but about viewing conditions. Group shows suit them as their uniqueness asserts itself easily.


 
Link 
william blake
2 May 2007 11:11 am
24 articles & 677 comments since 15 Aug 2006
yes meybe its not apt to call scully a grid painter any more, with all the expressive paint etc. though he certainly came from the hard edge school and that discipline has underpinned where he is now. This begs the question, where will these artists be in 20 years time artistically? Scully 'filled up' his grids with narrative in the flush of 80's po-mo. This kind of work, at vavasour godkin, now, is more of an accommodation of late modernism in a pluralistic paradigm. Which is fine as each work and exhibition should be taken on its merits but will these artists (or any working in this idiom for that matter) be able to develop this style beyond the accepted conventions. In the current climate it may be only possible to view this show accurately in light of future works.


 
Link 
John Hurrell
3 May 2007 1:32 am
122 articles & 1508 comments since 2 Dec 2005
What's this,WB, about Scully filling his grids with narrative? What are you saying? It sounds appalling. God, nothing destroys a good artwork quicker than narrative. A most insidious quality.


 

Page: 1 2   Next >>

Add your comment:


You must login to leave a comment. If you are not a member yet, joining is free and fast.
Page Loads
2642
Visitors
1954